Like I said, it may … Like I said, it may just come down to preference. I find cannon and sony usually have the best colors. But because you’re so adamant about it I’ll take another look at the K200. The continuous shot is rather important to me though – just because it’s fun.
February 16th, 2009 | 6:50 am
ftpaddict:
Doesn’t use compact … Doesn’t use compact flash = cheaper SD memory cards.
Have you actually used the Rebel or A200? I have, and what you just said there isn’t exactly true.
Lenses matter a lot more; and in Pentax’ current lineup, there are no second-class citizens.
February 16th, 2009 | 6:50 am
ftpaddict:
It might surprise … It might surprise you, but the Pentax kit lens is one of the best in terms of image quality. Just read the many opinions and reviews on the internet.
February 16th, 2009 | 6:50 am
ubercow:
I don’t own any of … I don’t own any of the cameras, but I’ve used them and seen the results. I’m speaking only of kit lenses because I don’t have the money for anything else atm. I suppose SDHC is almost as good as Compact Flash though. Still, the K200’s quality is noticeably less with the kit lens. (part of which is preference I presume)
February 16th, 2009 | 6:50 am
ubercow:
I’m new to this, … I’m new to this, I’d just like to point out that the K200 is about $100 more, it doesn’t use Compact Flash, Continuous shooting is horrid, and the picture quality isn’t as good as the Rebel or A200.
The AA feature and the AF are appealing though.
February 16th, 2009 | 6:50 am
ftpaddict:
Bigger, brighter … Bigger, brighter viewfinder
11 AF points out of which 9 are cross-type
Weather sealing
Works with AA batteries (big bonus for when you’re travelling)
RAW + JPEG and dedicated RAW button
Most new Pentax lenses are better than those re-badged Minolta lenses that Sony is selling, at unbelievably high prices
I could go on for ages.
If you do sports photography, those 3fps are worth exactly squat.
And if you think bigger numbers will take better pictures, stick with a 12 megapixel point-and-shoot.
February 16th, 2009 | 6:50 am
metofski:
Considerable… Considerable…
February 16th, 2009 | 6:50 am
ooiuczc:
FUCK MAN I know. … MAN I know. But hey, do u want to watch TV on ur PC
You’ll get all the SKY CHANNELS there is
AND from any country IN THE WORLD, on your pc screen!!!!
Go to this website…
frexis.*com/PCTV27.html
(DELETE the *)
check it out…………….its cool, i’ve got it myself.
February 16th, 2009 | 6:50 am
metofski:
Intimidating! I’m … Intimidating! I’m really confused! Nikon D60, Canon 1000D or Sony A300…? All got almost the same price, same quality, but minor differences: live view, focus points, optical focus…
Please tell me which one of these is the best, thanks
February 16th, 2009 | 6:50 am
ftpaddict:
The Pentax K200D … The Pentax K200D gives you the best bang for the buck.
February 16th, 2009 | 6:50 am
metofski:
Are you sure? … Are you sure? Pentax got 16Segment, Sony got 40, Pentax 2.8fsp up to 4jpeg Sony 3.0 unlimited!, Just the body price equals Sony with twin lens! Still you’re sure?
Like I said, it may …
Like I said, it may just come down to preference. I find cannon and sony usually have the best colors. But because you’re so adamant about it I’ll take another look at the K200. The continuous shot is rather important to me though – just because it’s fun.
Doesn’t use compact …
Doesn’t use compact flash = cheaper SD memory cards.
Have you actually used the Rebel or A200? I have, and what you just said there isn’t exactly true.
Lenses matter a lot more; and in Pentax’ current lineup, there are no second-class citizens.
It might surprise …
It might surprise you, but the Pentax kit lens is one of the best in terms of image quality. Just read the many opinions and reviews on the internet.
I don’t own any of …
I don’t own any of the cameras, but I’ve used them and seen the results. I’m speaking only of kit lenses because I don’t have the money for anything else atm. I suppose SDHC is almost as good as Compact Flash though. Still, the K200’s quality is noticeably less with the kit lens. (part of which is preference I presume)
I’m new to this, …
I’m new to this, I’d just like to point out that the K200 is about $100 more, it doesn’t use Compact Flash, Continuous shooting is horrid, and the picture quality isn’t as good as the Rebel or A200.
The AA feature and the AF are appealing though.
Bigger, brighter …
Bigger, brighter viewfinder
11 AF points out of which 9 are cross-type
Weather sealing
Works with AA batteries (big bonus for when you’re travelling)
RAW + JPEG and dedicated RAW button
Most new Pentax lenses are better than those re-badged Minolta lenses that Sony is selling, at unbelievably high prices
I could go on for ages.
If you do sports photography, those 3fps are worth exactly squat.
And if you think bigger numbers will take better pictures, stick with a 12 megapixel point-and-shoot.
Considerable…
Considerable…
FUCK MAN I know. …
MAN I know. But hey, do u want to watch TV on ur PC
You’ll get all the SKY CHANNELS there is
AND from any country IN THE WORLD, on your pc screen!!!!
Go to this website…
frexis.*com/PCTV27.html
(DELETE the *)
check it out…………….its cool, i’ve got it myself.
Intimidating! I’m …
Intimidating! I’m really confused! Nikon D60, Canon 1000D or Sony A300…? All got almost the same price, same quality, but minor differences: live view, focus points, optical focus…
Please tell me which one of these is the best, thanks
The Pentax K200D …
The Pentax K200D gives you the best bang for the buck.
Are you sure? …
Are you sure? Pentax got 16Segment, Sony got 40, Pentax 2.8fsp up to 4jpeg Sony 3.0 unlimited!, Just the body price equals Sony with twin lens! Still you’re sure?